Botulinum Toxin in the Oily Skin: Advantage of a Multi-Needle Device for a Controlled Release.

BACKGROUND: Oily skin is one of the most common dermatological complaints. With the obligation to use masks to protect themselves from the Covid-19 virus, the problem has become even more evident. One of the treatments proposed is the use of onabotulinumtoxin-A injected sub-dermally. For an optimal result, the injections must be done on the whole area with numerous micro-injections located only in the sub-dermis. The procedure is often poorly tolerated by patients and sometimes accompanied by hematomas and bruises. This research aimed to test a disposable device to inject botulin toxin at 1.5 mm under the skin with a painless procedure and homogeneous distribution of the toxin. METHODS: We treated patients with oily skin with the injection of 100 IU of Onabotulinumtoxin-A (diluted in 5 ml of a saline solution). All the patients were evaluated after 2 weeks, one month, and three months. RESULTS: In 10 patients, after 15 days we observed a real improvement of the quality of the skin; for two, the results were present at the 1 month follow up. In all cases, the treatment appeared homogeneous in the entire face. All the patients considered the procedure virtually painless or with minimal discomfort. CONCLUSION: In accordance with other authors, we confirm the real advantages of micro-botulinum toxin for oily skin. Moreover, the use of this simple and innovative device allows a homogeneous distribution of the drug in the correct plane, without pain, and reduces the risks of common complications. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;21(1): doi:10.36849/JDD.6900.

Masks trigger facial seborrheic dermatitis and psoriasis: evidence from a multicenter, case-control study during COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Wearing masks is an optimal preventive strategy during COVID-19 pandemic, but it may increase facial sebum production. However, few case reports have described seborrheic dermatitis (SeBD) and psoriasis (PsO) flares due to masks. Hence, we conducted a multicenter study to clarify the possibility of increased SeBD and PsO flares in association with mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This multicenter study enrolled patients with a diagnosis of facial SeBD and PsO. All dermatological consultations were conducted in teledermatology at baseline (T0) and after 1 month (T1) Of >6 hours/day wearing mask. PsO patients were assessed using PsO Area and Severity Index (PASI) and self-administered PASI (SAPASI), whilst SeBD patients with symptom scale of seborrheic dermatitis' (SSSD) and seborrheic dermatitis area and severity index (SEDASI). RESULTS: A total of 33 (20 males, 13 females, average age 43.61±9.86) patients with PsO and 33 (20 males, 13 females, average age 44.00±8.58) with SeBD were enrolled. After 1 month, PsO patients displayed higher values of both PASI and SAPASI (P<0.0001), while SeBD patients experienced a flare, as testified by the increment of both SSSD and SEDASI (P<0.0001). Mask type did not seem to influence the flare severity. CONCLUSIONS: Masks remain an optimal preventive strategy during COVID-19 pandemic, but patients with PsO and SeBD may experience facial flares. Thus, therapeutic approach should be more aggressive in these groups of patients to counteract the triggering effect of masks.

Targeted Delivery of Zinc Pyrithione to Skin Epithelia.

Zinc pyrithione (ZnPT) is an anti-fungal drug delivered as a microparticle to skin epithelia. It is one of the most widely used ingredients worldwide in medicated shampoo for treating dandruff and seborrheic dermatitis (SD), a disorder with symptoms that include skin flaking, erythema and pruritus. SD is a multi-factorial disease driven by microbiol dysbiosis, primarily involving Malassezia yeast. Anti-fungal activity of ZnPT depends on the cutaneous availability of bioactive monomeric molecular species, occurring upon particle dissolution. The success of ZnPT as a topical therapeutic is underscored by the way it balances treatment efficacy with formulation safety. This review demonstrates how ZnPT achieves this balance, by integrating the current understanding of SD pathogenesis with an up-to-date analysis of ZnPT pharmacology, therapeutics and toxicology. ZnPT has anti-fungal activity with an average in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration of 10-15 ppm against the most abundant scalp skin Malassezia species (Malassezia globosa and Malassezia restrica). Efficacy is dependent on the targeted delivery of ZnPT to the skin sites where these yeasts reside, including the scalp surface and hair follicle infundibulum. Imaging and quantitative analysis tools have been fundamental for critically evaluating the therapeutic performance and safety of topical ZnPT formulations. Toxicologic investigations have focused on understanding the risk of local and systemic adverse effects following exposure from percutaneous penetration. Future research is expected to yield further advances in ZnPT formulations for SD and also include re-purposing towards a range of other dermatologic applications, which is likely to have significant clinical impact.

[Occupational Dermatoses in Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review]. / Dermatoses Ocupacionais em Profissionais de Saúde durante a Pandemia de COVID-19: Revisão Narrativa.

INTRODUCTION: On the 11th March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus outbreak as a pandemic. Preventive measures such as the appropriate use of personal protective equipment and proper hand hygiene are essential in decreasing transmissibility. Healthcare workers have been required to wear personal protective equipment and to wash their hands even more frequently. These preventive measures are associated with an increased risk of skin conditions, namely, contact dermatitis and exacerbation of pre-existing skin lesions such as acne and seborrheic dermatitis. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the main skin lesions, and highlighting the role in occupational dermatology and preventive measures. METHODS: A search was conducted on PubMed and some guidelines from organizations like World Health Organization and Portuguese General Directorate of Health were included. RESULTS: Most skin conditions seen in healthcare professionals throughout the pandemic were associated with hand hygiene and the use of personal protective equipment and comprised hand eczema, mask-induced contact dermatitis, personal protective equipment related irritant contact dermatitis, cheilitis and exacerbation of pre-existing conditions such as acne and seborrheic dermatitis. Prevention and early recognition of dermatitis associated with personal protective equipment and hand hygiene are essential to maximize work performance, healthcare workers' safety and the adherence to preventive measures. CONCLUSION: Protection of healthcare workers' health and safety is an essential measure in the fight against the pandemic. Occupational Health has a fundamental role, acting in terms of disease prevention and health promotion, for example, through educational sessions and orientation of skin conditions associated with work, thus maximizing workers' well-being.

Introdução: A 11 de março de 2020, a Organização Mundial da Saúde declarou a doença provocada pelo novo coronavírus uma pandemia. As medidas de prevenção, nomeadamente, o uso apropriado de equipamento de proteção individual e a higienização das mãos, são essenciais na diminuição da transmissibilidade. Os profissionais de saúde têm particular indicação para o seu uso e para o aumento da frequência e duração da lavagem e desinfeção das mãos. Estas medidas estão associadas a um maior risco de desenvolvimento de patologias cutâneas como a dermatite de contacto e a exacerbação de lesões cutâneas pré-existentes, tais como a acne e a dermatite seborreica. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar uma descrição das principais lesões cutâneas, e salientar o papel da dermatologia ocupacional e medidas preventivas.Métodos: Foi realizada uma pesquisa na PubMed e incluídas orientações de organizações como a Direção-Geral da Saúde e a Organização Mundial da Saúde.Resultados: As principais patologias cutâneas observadas nos profissionais de saúde ao longo da pandemia associam-se à higienização das mãos e à utilização de equipamentos de proteção individual, consistindo, sucintamente, em eczema das mãos, dermatite de contacto induzida por máscaras, dermatite de contacto irritativa por traumatismo do equipamento de proteção individual, queilite e exacerbação de condições pré-existentes como acne e dermatite seborreica. A prevenção e o reconhecimento atempado das dermatites associadas ao uso de equipamento de proteção individual e ao reforço da higiene das mãos são fundamentais para otimizar o desempenho laboral e a segurança dos profissionais de saúde e maximizar a adesão às medidas preventivas.Conclusão: A proteção da saúde e da segurança dos profissionais de saúde constitui uma medida essencial no combate da pandemia, pelo que a Medicina do Trabalho assume um papel fundamental, atuando a nível da prevenção da doença e promoção da saúde, por exemplo, através da realização de sessões de educação e orientação das várias patologias cutâneas associadas ao trabalho, maximizando o bem-estar do trabalhador.

The change in the frequency and severity of facial dermatoses and complaints in healthcare workers during the COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, the increased use of PPEs may lead to facial skin complaints. AIMS: This survey study aims to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on facial dermatoses and complaints. METHODS: A total of 1017 volunteers (age 18-60 years), consisting of healthcare workers, participated in the study. In the present study, healthcare professionals were screened for facial dermatoses and complaints between 1 and 15 April 2021 with an online survey. RESULTS: The vast majority of the survey were women (82.4%) and between 26 and 35 years old (49.2%). The most new-onset facial complaints were acne (25.3%) and lip dryness (29.2%). Along with the pandemic, 50.9% of patients with seborrheic dermatitis had an increase in lesions. Another remarkable result was a 60.5% increase in acne complaints. Moreover, the rate of exacerbations of rosacea, melasma, and lip dryness was increased after the COVID-19 pandemic (39.1%, 22.0%, and 42.7%, respectively). Exacerbations of seborrheic dermatitis, acne, and lip dryness have occurred more frequently in females when compared to males (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current pandemic has had serious impacts on facial dermatoses which had to be managed carefully. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, there was a significant increase in the frequency and severity of complaints in facial dermatoses related to PPE. If the complaints that may develop due to PPE are known in advance, their development can be prevented by taking precautions against them.

Evaluation of the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on hair diseases through a web-based questionnaire.

AIM: Current quarantine conditions are a difficult process for individuals and can worsen the psychological state. Increased psychosocial stress can affect the course of many common "stress-sensitive" skin conditions. This study examined the possible effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on hair and scalp diseases such as telogen effluvium (TE), alopecia areata (AA), and seborrheic dermatitis (SD) in individuals who had to stay at home for a long time and the patients' methods of dealing with these diseases. METHODS: The study was conducted using an online questionnaire. All the individuals were asked questions about pre- and post-pandemic TE, AA, and SD. Participants with complaints were asked what they did for treatment. RESULTS: During the pandemic, TE was seen in 27.9% of the participants, AA on the scalp was seen in 2.8%, AA on the face was seen in 2.5%, and SD was seen in 19.9%. Applying to a dermatologist for complaints during the pandemic was lower than before pandemic. TE was higher in women before and during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: It was found that the rates of referring to a dermatologist for the complaints before the pandemic varied between 15% and 28% and that these rates decreased significantly during the pandemic (2.5%-12.5%).